Friday, May 11, 2012
Aside: On Kashmir
Sunday, March 22, 2009
SCP
There is heightening perception that rate cuts will not prevent India's corporate earnings growth from significantly cooling off. Confidence levels of companies about business prospects have declined with several companies resorting to lowering capacities and trimming staff in anticipation of lower demand. Even though the finance minister is confident of a return to 9% next year, market participants are not convinced, with a broader consensus being 6-7%. At this growth rate, the premium in share valuations which Indian companies have commanded in the recent bull-run could erode further. The global perception that emerging markets should trade in single-digit multiples could present some more downside risk to Indian equities. With the Sensex trading at 8.5 -9.0 times 2009-10 estimated earnings, though at higher valuations compared to other emerging economies makes it vulnerable to further downgrades as there is still a lack of clarity about the extent of the economic slowdown.
I have been using this newsletter to deal with macroeconomic and political factors of business performance. From this issue onward, I will begin to touch up the topic of Business Performance Management , our core area of expertise. I will be looking at performance management practices, frameworks, tools and software packages out there and the state of the art in management thinking with respect to the elements of business performance - strategy, structure, culture, process and systems. This week, I pick up on an article on the SCP framework in the McKinsey Quarterly that I read just earlier.
The SCP (Structure-Conduct-Performance) model is an interest tool to analyze businesses striving to compete within a market[McKinsey Quarterly, Jul 2008]. "The model's original form depicts the influence of an industry's structure (for example, the growth of demand and barriers to entry) on the conduct of producers (pricing, for example) and the performance of both the industry and the producers. The the 1980s, McKinsey suggested an extension that added a dynamic element to a static framework. the dynamic version suggests that the relationships among structure, conduct and performance are not unidirectional; they flow in the opposite direction too. This approach allows companies to consider the influence of their own conduct on an industry's structure and ultimately, on their own performance. Many companies use the revised model to play through various scenarios that might affect them, to gain an understanding of what's happening in their industries and to develop their strategies." An interesting case study would be the present behaviour of the Airline industry in India that has just completed the first phase of consolidation.
Despite a reduction in ATF over the past four months, domestic airlines have not reduced the fuel surcharge of Rs 3100 per sector compared to Rs 1350 last November, even as the price of fuel has come down to Rs 39,767/kl from Rs 41,417/kl last November. That implies passengers are forking out nearly Rs 1750 more as fuel surcharge on every ticket despite government action to abolish customs duties and provide for extended credit period for payment of fuel bills.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Nov 2008
There is heightening perception that rate cuts will not prevent India's corporate earnings growth from significantly cooling off. Confidence levels of companies about business prospects have declined with several companies resorting to lowering capacities and trimming staff in anticipation of lower demand. Even though the finance minister is confident of a return to 9% next year, market participants are not convinced, with a broader consensus being 6-7%. At this growth rate, the premium in share valuations which Indian companies have commanded in the recent bull-run could erode further. The global perception that emerging markets should trade in single-digit multiples could present some more downside risk to Indian equities. With the Sensex trading at 8.5 -9.0 times 2009-10 estimated earnings, though at higher valuations compared to other emerging economies makes it vulnerable to further downgrades as there is still a lack of clarity about the extent of the economic slowdown.
I have been using this newsletter to deal with macroeconomic and political factors of business performance. From this issue onward, I will begin to touch up the topic of Business Performance Management , our core area of expertise. I will be looking at performance management practices, frameworks, tools and software packages out there and the state of the art in management thinking with respect to the elements of business performance - strategy, structure, culture, process and systems. This week, I pick up on an article on the SCP framework in the McKinsey Quarterly that I read just earlier.The SCP (Structure-Conduct-Performance) model is an interest tool to analyze businesses striving to compete within a market[McKinsey Quarterly, Jul 2008]. "The model's original form depicts the influence of an industry's structure (for example, the growth of demand and barriers to entry) on the conduct of producers (pricing, for example) and the performance of both the industry and the producers. The the 1980s, McKinsey suggested an extension that added a dynamic element to a static framework. the dynamic version suggests that the relationships among structure, conduct and performance are not unidirectional; they flow in the opposite direction too. This approach allows companies to consider the influence of their own conduct on an industry's structure and ultimately, on
their own performance. Many companies use the revised model to play through various scenarios that might affect them, to gain an understanding of what's happening in their industries and to develop their strategies." An interesting case study would be the present behaviour of the Airline industry in India that has just completed the first phase of consolidation. Sunday, November 23, 2008
Credit crunch - first impact
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Nuclear Deal and Beyond
As the mess in the US financial system spreads across the Atlantic, the reaction of European governments have been as swift and on an unprecedented scale as governments rushed in to prop up ailing financial institutions with huge cash injections or full-blown nationalization. Governments of the Benelux countries - Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg have agreed to inject $16.4 billion into Fortis - the first major euro zone bank to falter. In Germany, the $51.2 billion bailout of the No 2 commercial property lender Hypo Real Estate Holding narrowly escaped failure due to disagreement on their participation in the guarantees. In the UK, just a year after the collapse of the Northern Rock, the government has nationalized the assets of buy-to-let specialist Bradford and Bingley. In Ireland, government announced a $560 billion guarantee to cover deposits and debts of six biggest banks. And the bourses from the US to Japan have already caught a chill as the $700 billion US bailout package struggles through the hallways on Capitol Hill.At home, an outflow of 1700 crores by FIIs on the closing day of the week, sent the Sensex plunging 529 points to 12532 with Metals taking the hardest pounding with a drop of 7%.. Though inflation continued to hold at the +/- 12% levels, a strengthening dollar is offsetting the fall in oil prices and sending the OMCs into a tizzy. Oil and Gas Index lost nearly 6% while the consumer durables ended just over 4% in the negative.
The exit of Tata Motors Nano project from Singur in West Bengal brought the curtains down on a sorry political comedy that played out over several months with the TMC pitted against the CPM in what could only be a short-sighted struggle for relevance. Besides putting the company's 1500 crore investment at risk, the decision also affects hundreds of auto ancillary units that would have to relocate along with the mother plant.How can companies guard against such setbacks? What can be done to manage growth and profitability in the backdrop of so much of uncertainty? Can the management team in corporate houses do more to stabilize performance through graded response to macroeconomic developments? There are many who are of the opionion that the $700 billion bailout of the financial services sector seeks only to stabilize a business model that no longer meets the dynamics of the interconnected 21st century market where the flutter of a butterfly wing in one part of the world can spawn a hurricane in another.
We live in interesting times - change appears to be the only constant.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Black September!
On the positive side, the waiver obtained from the exclusive Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) was exceptional and as always, attributed to the tireless efforts of a few good men. The event did not go completely unopposed. Western editorials were quite scathing in their attack on India’s seemingly outrageous attempts to bypass the NPT regime stating that the ban on trade with countries that break the non-proliferation rules has been the chief underpinning of the NPT regime. However, the recognition by the current US government of the strategic alignment of common interests of the world’s oldest and largest democracies might still pave a bipartisan way for the 123 agreement through the US Congress.
The events in the global financial markets, specifically in the United States, has been unprecedented both in terms of the nature of the disaster and its magnitude. Lehman Brothers filed for bancruptcy, Merrill Lynch has agreed to be purchased by Bank of America, Bear Stearns has gone, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have been converted to retail commercial banks. With AIG and WaMu floundering and the bailout of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by the Fed, the financial market as we knew it ceased to exist. Once the full extent of the crisis unravels through bouts of deleveraging, someone will have the time to write an obituary to the business model that governed Wall St for more than half a century.
Not exactly the brightest September by a long shot!
